LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF ALCOHOL USE AND ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN YOUNG BISHOP
Thursday, August 19, 2010
What Are Company Car Requirements
Summary:
To examine the direction of causality between youth antisocial behavior and consumption (mis) use short and long term together with the effects associated with alcohol-related problem .
Methods: Data from a longitudinal study (2586 students) for exploring the effects of alcohol (mis) use and antisocial behavior between 11 and 15 years of age, using structural equation models of relationships and short-term and models of the effects associated to the problem related to alcohol at 15 years of age.
This method allowed us to evaluate which of the three scenarios described as 'disinhibition' [alcohol (mis) of alcohol causes or facilitates antisocial behavior], 'susceptibility' [antisocial behavior causes the consumer (mis) use] or "reciprocity" [consumption (mis) use causes antisocial behavior and vice versa], received more support, both overall and by gender, social class and the context in which it is drunk.
Results: Overall, the results support the susceptibility hypothesis, particularly in long-term models. No support for disinhibition "pure." However, in the short-term models and associated effects (ie, until the time lag becomes shorter) there is evidence that depending on gender, social class or drinking places, it follows that, in addition to antisocial behavior causes alcohol (mis) of alcohol, the reverse also occurs.
Conclusions: Antisocial behavior is the main predictor of alcohol (mis) use and the problem related to alcohol, alcohol consumption impacting only modestly on antisocial behavior and alcohol-related problem in the short term.
Introduction This article examines the relationship between alcohol (mis) use, antisocial behavior and alcohol-related problems (ie, the concomitance of alcohol and disruptive behavior) among youth in the West of Scotland in the latter half of the 90. The evidence of a dramatic rise in alcohol consumption in this age group (especially women) both in this area concrete (Sweeting and West, 2003) and in general in the United Kingdom (Rodham et al., 2005, Plant and Plant, 2006), together with its poor position in comparison with the rest of Europe (Hibell et al., 2004) , has made the reduction in consumption (mis) use, especially binge drinking to alcohol and public drunkenness, a priority of the British Government (State Office, Strategy Unit of the Prime Minister, 2004). Similarly, evidence of an increase in behavioral problems in youth (Collishaw et al., 2004) justified various policies to reduce antisocial behavior.
Given the well established relationship between alcohol (mis) use and antisocial behavior (Plant et al., 1985, Sanford, 2001; Miczek et al., 2004, Rose et al., 2004) an important step in this feature try to reduce alcohol consumption youth. (Marsh and Fox, 1992).
Although well documented, the relationship between alcohol (mis) use and antisocial behavior is not simple, with different visions that yield different predictions about the direction of causality. This can be formulated as three basic hypotheses, representing disinhibition effect, sensitivity and reciprocity, respectively, each of which can be applied to both short and long term.
The first (disinhibition hypothesis) states that alcohol causes or facilitates antisocial behavior in the short (immediate) term, as a result of acute effects on the brain, particularly its impact on pre-frontal functioning (Room and Collins 1988, Bushman and Cooper, 1990, Graham et al., 1988). For example, a study of young people concluded that violence among alcohol-dependent individuals occurred when, possibly because they were under the influence of alcohol (Arseneaukt et al., 2000).
long term, there is an additional potential impact of chronic (mis) use on antisocial behavior through involvement the hippocampus (memory limitations, learning and consequently, overall executive functioning) or other neurological limitations Tapert et al., 2005, Howard, 2006). Moreover, the excess alcohol may be associated with limited relationships with parents and peers, difficulties in school or work, conflicts with the security forces and a chain of relationships perverted or antisocial (Brook et al. 1998).
contrast with the view that preaches an effect of alcohol on antisocial behavior, the second hypothesis (susceptibility) argues the opposite, people with susceptibility to, or in the path of antisocial behavior, consume
alcohol to a greater extent than those who are less susceptible. Thus, antisocial behavior is the cause of consumption (mis) use,
both short and long term. The consumption of drugs, including alcohol, by adolescents has been associated with features such as loss of control and aggression at ages (much) earlier (Block et al., 1988, Windle, 1990, While et al., 1993; Brooke et al., 1996), causing a general inability to control behavior. This could arise from various causes including genetic factors common
cos (Clark et al., 2002, Cooper et al., 2003, Stallings et al., 2005) or social factors. Each of these explanation is consistent with the notion that emotional
above represent the essence of psychopathological processes, in this case expressed by externalizing problems (Krueger et al., 1998). Alternatively (or additionally), antisocial behavior can cause a consumer (mis) use of alcohol by association with other antisocial drinkers (Barnow et al., 2006).
Finally, the third (reciprocal hypothesis) posits that both the consumer (mis) use causes antisocial behavior such as consumption can cause antisocial behavior (mis) use, thus creating a feedback loop.
the short term, alcohol and antisocial behavior can feed each other intensifying aggression in particular social contexts (Graham et al., 1998, 2000). In the long term, the result of alcohol (mis) use of alcohol can interact with individual factors (impulsivity, sensation seeking, aggressive personality) thereby increasing deregulation and the problems of view, leading to even worse about alcohol consumption and behavior antisocial (Howard, 2006; Measelle et al., 2006).
Each of the scenarios discussed above explains the relationship between alcohol (mis) use and antisocial behavior general.
more specific problems related to alcohol such as fights, arguments or problems with the police due to drinking may be associated effects (trend) antisocial behavior in addition to consumer (mis) use. Therefore, the same three hypotheses are relevant to prognosis. Consequently, the disinhibition hypothesis suggests that alcohol (mis) use of alcohol is a better predictor of alcohol-related problems, the susceptibility hypothesis that better predicted by antisocial behavior and the reciprocal hypothesis that both alcohol as antisocial behavior predict problems alcohol related.
In support of the latter, a recent study found that significant predictors of fighting alcohol related teens included heavy drinking and frequent alcohol (suggesting disinhibition) and problems in school such as relationship problems with teachers or peers, or attention difficulties (suggesting susceptibility) (Swahn and Donovan, 2005). Full report
RET Journal
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment